12 jurors why

We know from earlier in the movie that this guy has it in for the defendant because he 3 has issues with kids not respecting their fathers. He hasn't seen his own son in over two years, and he feels the need to punish someone for what's happened in his own life. And that someone is the kid on trial. But after one last epic blowout, even this guy has to let go of his hate and find the kid Not Guilty. The foreman calls in the bailiff, and the men give their verdict. After leaving the courthouse, Juror 8 runs into another one of the jurors, and they exchange their names.

Then 8 walks off with a big smile on his face, feeling proud for having saved the life of an innocent young man. Parents Home Homeschool College Resources.

Study Guide. Previous Next. But sure enough, one of the other jurors votes Not Guilty, and the conversation continues. Cobb Juror 4 E. What's Up With the Ending?

Shock Rating. Jack Warden Juror 7 as Juror 7. Joseph Sweeney Juror 9 as Juror 9. Ed Begley Juror 10 as Juror George Voskovec Juror 11 as Juror Robert Webber Juror 12 as Juror Rudy Bond Judge as Judge uncredited.

Tom Gorman Stenographer as Stenographer uncredited. James Kelly Guard as Guard uncredited. Sidney Lumet. Reginald Rose story screenplay. More like this. Watch options. Storyline Edit. The defense and the prosecution have rested, and the jury is filing into the jury room to decide if a young man is guilty or innocent of murdering his father.

What begins as an open-and-shut case of murder soon becomes a detective story that presents a succession of clues creating doubt, and a mini-drama of each of the jurors' prejudices and preconceptions about the trial, the accused, AND each other. Based on the play, all of the action takes place on the stage of the jury room. Did you know Edit. Trivia At the beginning of the film, the cameras are all positioned above eye level and mounted with wide-angle lenses to give the appearance of greater distance between the subjects.

As the film progresses the cameras slip down to eye level. By the end of the film, nearly all of it is shot below eye level, in close-up and with telephoto lenses to increase the encroaching sense of claustrophobia. Goofs Within the last half hour of the movie, the clock on the wall in the jury room can be seen indicating Several minutes later, E.

Marshall states that it is "a quarter after six". Several minutes after that, the wall clock is seen again, but still shows Still later, when Lee J. Cobb leans over the table after he tears up the snapshot from his wallet, his watch can be seen indicating Quotes Juror 8 : Let me ask you this: Do you really think the boy'd shout out a thing like that so the whole neighborhood could hear him?

Crazy credits At the end of the film, the actors are billed in order of their juror numbers; thus Henry Fonda , although the star of the film, appears 8th. People have debated over keeping or losing the term limits, since each come with their own benefits and faults at the same time.

The validity in this statement proves to be one of the strongest arguments because the creation of laws is mean to serve all people, and if the people in office had complete immunity, it would serve unfair and unjust to the rest of society. For this reason, it always will make those in office consider how impactful and. They believed that because people are instinctively selfish, that people would have a hard time coexisting in a land where all people were supposed to be treated equal.

The fact that the constitution was written in the mindset that people needed to be, in a sense, controlled is was and remains a controversial topic. These facts aside, in order to instill equality to a newlywed nation, the people were given some basic human rights and the power to choose who was going to represent them in order to still make sure that the people were still the basis of the new government while still having control over them.

An agreement from the jury is a unanimous decision between all 12 jurors. The jury consists of everyday citizens given the responsibility of deciding the innocence or guilt of an accused person. Jurors should decide the fate of the accused because it is a peaceful method to resolve the problem, a unique constitutional right not many people in the world get to enjoy , and it gives everyday citizens a chance to participate in the government and represent the voice of the people.

First of all using a jury provides a peaceful method to resolve issues. A jury represents everyday people who all have different viewpoints on different things.

In the play 12 Angry Men the people on the jury were everyday people and they were asked to choose whether the boy was guilty of murder. Had there been no jury a government would use the boy as an example of what would happen if you murder and send him to his death. It is one of the things that make us unique as a country, and something we should be proud of.

Serving on a jury gives people insight into the justice system and their own communities, and corrects misapprehensions about what takes place in a courtroom. Having citizens serve on the jury lets them learn more about the countries judicial branch.

Other than being a good learning opportunity it gives the people a voice in the government. Juries provide the voice of common sense and the perspective of the citizen to our developing law of the land. Show More. Read More. Jury Duty In Twelve Angry Men Words 5 Pages The jurors contradict themselves by starting off saying one thing and then later they say or do the exact opposite. The Jury's Guilt In 12 Angry Men Words 4 Pages It is not known if the boy is actually guilty or innocent, it will always remain hidden with the boy.

Juror's Guilt In 12 Angry Men Words 3 Pages 12 Angry men is about 12 jury members and a foreman who are trying to determine if a boy is innocent or guilty.

Argumentative Essay On 12 Angry Men Words 3 Pages What if one day, twenty years from now you were chosen to discuss the fate of an eighteen year old boy. Apush Dahl Summary Words 7 Pages When Dahl first begins the book, on the very first page, he talks about a key point everyone should know.

Describe The Conflict Between The Two-Party Pros And Cons Words 2 Pages The conflict between the parties is weakening the power of our national government because without Congress working together to create laws they are opposing each other.

Essay On Congressional Term Limits Words 3 Pages Congressional term limits have been what restricted the amount of time that anyone can work in office whether it be to a representative, senator, or even the president.